Skip to main content
· 3/23/2011

In Re ExxonMobil Production Co.

Citations

  • 340 S.W.3d 852
  • 2011 Tex. App. LEXIS 2049
  • 2011 WL 1044266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting mandamus review finding ExxonMobil did not have an adequate remedy by appeal
  • “Limiting mandamus relief as per Abor precludes the flexibility of the remedy in plea in abatement cases because Abor’s holding fails to account for any case-by-case consideration of the benefits and detriments of mandamus review.”
  • “The appellate remedy for the improper denial of a plea in abatement is ‘virtually automatic’ reversal.”
  • “The appellate remedy for the improper denial of a plea in abatement is ‘virtually automatic’ reversal.”
  • “The appellate remedy for the improper denial of a plea in abatement is virtually automatic reversal.” (internal quotes omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Speedlin, Simmons, Barnard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.