Skip to main content
· 11/5/1992

In re Extensión del Término para Comentarios y Recomendaciones al Reglamento del Tribunal de Apelaciones

Citations

  • 131 P.R. Dec. 964

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting, under § 1500’s predecessor, the contention that once the co-pending district court litigation was final, a party could prosecute its claim filed prior to the final resolution
  • “there is no merit in the contention ... that this court has jurisdiction ... for the reason that the suit in the District Court has been dismissed and is not now pending”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.