Skip to main content
· 9/30/2009

In Re Expunction of Jones

Citations

  • 311 S.W.3d 502
  • 2009 Tex. App. LEXIS 7616
  • 2009 WL 3152164

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the appellee knowingly entered into the PTD agreement and the fact that he failed to read agreement or that he did not understand the word “expunction” did not excuse him from the agreement’s legal effect
  • “[a]bsent proof of mental incapacity, a person who signs a contract is presumed to have read and understood the contract, unless he was prevented from doing so by trick or artifice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chew, McCLURE, Rivera

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.