· 6/12/2000
In Re: Executive Office of the President
Citations
- 215 F.3d 25
- 342 U.S. App. D.C. 25
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23697
- 2000 WL 749486
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that neither the recusal statute nor the Code of Conduct requires a judge’s recusal even from a case involving the president who appointed him
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tatel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.