Skip to main content
· 6/12/2000

In Re: Executive Office of the President

Citations

  • 215 F.3d 25
  • 342 U.S. App. D.C. 25
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 23697
  • 2000 WL 749486

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that neither the recusal statute nor the Code of Conduct requires a judge’s recusal even from a case involving the president who appointed him

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.