In re Everett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the inherited IRA is a liquid asset rather than a retirement fund, the Court finds the purpose of protecting [the Debtor] from being reduced by financial misfortune to absolute want is not served by allowing [the Debtor] to claim the inherited IRA as exempt.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In re Todd
  N.D. New York· 2018-03-23· cited 4×
• Kenneth Kelly v. Thomas A. Stewart
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2025-12-17

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings & Investment Plan
  Supreme Court· 2009-01-26· cited 279×
• Clark v. Rameker
  Supreme Court· 2014-06-12· cited 76×
• Estate of Kensinger v. URL Pharma, Inc.
  Third Circuit· 2012-03-20· cited 46×
• Canal Bank v. Hudson
  Supreme Court· 1884-03-24· cited 27×
• In Re Sims
  N.D. Oklahoma· 1999-11-23· cited 23×
• In Re Greenfield
  S.D. California· 2003-01-31· cited 14×
• In Re Hendrick
  M.D. Louisiana· 1985-01-11· cited 14×
• In Re Kirchen
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2006-07-07· cited 13×
• Chilton v. Moser
  Fifth Circuit· 2012-03-12· cited 11×
• Ward v. Turner
  E.D. Louisiana· 1994-12-27· cited 10×
• Ward v. Turner
  E.D. Louisiana· 1993-02-03· cited 8×
• In Re Black
  M.D. Louisiana· 1998-10-15· cited 8×
• In Re Brown
  M.D. Louisiana· 1996-01-31· cited 6×
• Mexic v. Mexic
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 2001-06-22· cited 5×
• Metairie Bank & Trust Co. v. Ward
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1999-04-21· cited 1×