In re Eva P. Vekos, Esq. (Office of Disciplinary Counsel)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[F]or [a] non-provisional utility ap- plication to be afforded the priority date of [a] provisional application, . . . the written description of the provisional must adequately support the claims of the non-provisional application.”
• first citing 35 U.S.C. § 111(b); then citing 35 U.S.C. § 119(e)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).