In re Ethier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting “relevance” as the first consideration in determining if a non-party subpoena poses an undue burden
• noting the need for documents as the second consideration in determining if a non-party subpoena poses an undue burden
• noting particularity of requests as another consideration in determining if a non-party subpoena poses an undue burden
• noting the time period covered by the request for documents as an additional consideration in determining if a non-party subpoena poses an undue burden
• “[W]hen an opposing party and a non-party both possess documents, the documents should be sought from the party to the case.”
• “In general, there is a preference for parties to obtain discovery from one 9 another before burdening non-parties with discovery requests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).