Federal Case

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the FAA mandate to enforce arbitration provisions applied in bankruptcy cases and bankruptcy adversaries, whether the issue was core or non-core
• finding no evidence of such an intent in the statutory text or legislative history of the bankruptcy code
• finding no evidence of such intent in either the statutory text or the legislative history of the Bankruptcy Code
• reversing denial of motion to compel arbitration; bankruptcy court lacked authority and discretion to deny enforcement of arbitration for rescission claim
• “The core/non- core distinction does not . . . affect whether a bankruptcy court has the discretion to deny enforcement of an arbitration agreement”
• “The core/non-core distinction does not, however, affect whether a bankruptcy court has the discretion to deny enforcement of an arbitration agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).