In Re Estate of Thorp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that order construing will and approving sale of farm was final and had to be appealed within 30 days under Rule 304(b)(1)
• stating that the interpretation of a will is one of the specific issues in the administration of an estate that requires certainty and for which an immediate appeal must be brought under Rule 304(b)(1)
• stating that the interpretation of a will is one of the specific issues in the administration of an estate that requires certainty and for which an immediate appeal must be brought under Rule 304(b)(1)
• holding the court’s order directing the executor to sell a piece of real estate was a final order for purposes of Rule 304(b)(1), even though “the exact dollar amounts to be received by the legatees were yet to be ascertained”
• holding the trial court’s order directing the executor to sell a piece of real estate was a final order for purposes of Rule 304(b)(1), even though “the exact dollar amounts to be received by the legatees were yet to be ascertained”
• upholding award of attorneys’ fees to the attorney who had represented the executrix of an estate in an action by the executrix to construe an ambiguous will

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).