In Re Estate of Nelson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the language in RCW 11.20.070 (1965) was a codification of the common-law presumption of revocation
• where the trial court did not have an “opportunity to assess the credibility or weight of conflicting evidence by hearing live testimony,” appellate review of factual findings and legal conclusions is de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).