In re Estate of Means v. Means

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 2564

Syllabus

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ESTATE SETTLEMENT; WILL VALIDITY; UNDUE INFLUENCE; FRAUD, FAKE, FORGERY; R.C. 2109.50; WRONGFUL CONCEALMENT, EMBEZZLEMENT, WRONGFUL CONCEALMENT, EMBEZZLEMENT, CONVEYANCE OF ESTATE ASSETS. The probate court did not err by granting summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff-appellee on two key claims: first, his claim challenging the validity of the 2020 will on the grounds of undue influence, and second, his claim that the defendants-appellants wrongfully concealed, embezzled, or conveyed estate assets under R.C. 2109.50.