In Re Estate of Laitinen

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The fact that evidence has been excluded improperly is harmless if it can be shown that it has been admitted at another time or in another form.”
• “[E]vidence which tends to show that the beneficiary acquired control over the testator’s mind before the will was made, and retained such control beyond the period at which the will was executed, is admissible . . . .” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).