Skip to main content
· 11/13/1893

In re Estate of Kamaka

Citations

  • 9 Haw. 245
  • 1893 Haw. LEXIS 50

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a court may properly consider video evidence in 6 ruling on a motion for summary judgment and should view the facts “in the light depicted 7 by the videotape”
  • instructing that in determining summary judgment motions, “facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party only if there is a ‘genuine’ dispute as to those facts” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bickerton, Frear, Judd

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.