· 9/9/2019
In Re Estate of John E. Mayfield - Dissenting
Syllabus
I respectfully dissent from the majority's reversal of the Trial Court's order dismissing Mr. Saltsman's claim. I instead would affirm the dismissal because Mr. Mayfield informed Mr. Saltsman before Mr. Saltsman ever even saw it that the Commercial Purchase and Sale Agreement (\the Purported Instrument\) was invalid and, as the majority states, \had to be rewritten . . .\, and Mr. Saltsman acknowledged and agreed to that.
Judges: Chief Judge D. Michael Swiney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.