Skip to main content
· 10/31/2006

In Re Estate of Haskins

Citations

  • 224 S.W.3d 675
  • 2006 Tenn. App. LEXIS 708

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a contract must “result from a meeting of the minds and must be sufficiently definite” (quoting Jamestowne on Signal, Inc. v. First Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 807 S.W.2d 559, 564 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1990)
  • affirming trial court’s denial of plaintiff’s late-filed motion to amend complaint to add new parties
  • “The granting or denying of a motion to amend is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will be reversed only for an abuse of discretion.”
  • “The granting or denying of a motion to amend is within the sound discretion of the trial court and will be reversed only for an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharon G. Lee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.