Skip to main content
· 6/18/1991

In Re Estate of Duane

Citations

  • 765 F. Supp. 1200
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8343
  • 1991 WL 110829

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that claimant in probate action could not remove under Section 1441(a) because he could not be considered the defendant where he had filed and was seeking a claim for pension benefits against the estate
  • holding that claimant in probate action could not remove under Section 1441(a) because he could not be considered the defendant where he had filed and was seeking a claim for pension benefits against the estate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sprizzo

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.