In Re Estate of Ahmed

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the consistent and exclusive use of the term “may” indicates that the court is not required to grant requests made by a party but may do so within its discretion
• holding that the consistent and exclusive use of the term \may\ indicates that the court is not required to grant requests made by a party but may do so within its discretion
• when a statute uses the word “may,” we interpret the statute as permissive
• when a statute uses the word “may,” we interpret the statute as permissive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).