Skip to main content
· 5/20/2016

In Re: Estate of Adele M. Rich

Citations

  • 139 A.3d 235
  • 2016 Pa. Super. 104

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the admission of evidence that the defendant sold drugs on other occasions was harmless when the evidence that he committed the charged crimes was strong
  • concluding that error in admitting evidence of defendant’s prior drug-dealing activities was harmless in part due to properly admitted testimony showing that defendant had dealt similar drugs on other occasions
  • evidence of 15-year-old bank robbery conviction was harmless because of otherwise overwhelming evidence of guilt
  • uncharged sales of prescription pills were relevant where they had same intent as the charged offense of possession of a controlled substance with intent to distribute
  • wrongly admitted evidence of drug deals was harmless given “strong” evidence of defendant’s guilt and other properly admitted evidence that he had distributed drugs to people other than the murder victim
  • admission of 404 (b) evidence harmless where evidence of guilt was strong

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Elliott, Stabile, Strassburger

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.