Skip to main content
· 10/25/1897

In re Estate of Adams

Citations

  • 183 Pa. 134
  • 38 A. 514
  • 1897 Pa. LEXIS 725

Syllabus

<p>Decedents' estates — Orphans' court practice — Bill of review — Laches.</p> <p>In 1881 a trustee under a will filed an account showing a certain amount in his hands, and a bill of review of said account is now asked. In 1895 the trustee’s executors filed a final account of the trust showing that the trustee had expended the whole fund for the maintenance and care of the cestui que trust in an institution for the insane. The petition for review averred that the trust estate was not a fund in the hands of the trustee, but an interest in a banking house of which the testator and the trustee were partners. The account of 1881 showed on its face that the fund was a deposit in the banking house drawing interest. There was no allegation in the petition that the petitioner was without knowledge of the two accounts filed, or so situated that he could not inspect the same. It also appeared that all the facts were accessible to the petitioner at the time of the filing of the first account. Held, that the petitioner was guilty of laches, and that a bill of review should be refused.</p>

Judges: Dean, Fell, McCollum, Mitchell, Oreen, Sterrett, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.