Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 6/19/2001
In re Erik M.
Citations
- 146 N.H. 508
- 775 A.2d 491
- 2001 N.H. LEXIS 105
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating no hearing required in superior court on acceptance of certification and transfer from district court where defendant did not set forth reasons why hearing would assist court
- affirming trial court’s refusal to 1 Given the procedural history of this case, we need not address whether the discovery rule applies. See RSA 508:4, I (2010). 4 hold hearing where defendant failed to set forth any reason why a hearing would assist the court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brock, Broderick, Dalianis, Nadeau
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Provencher v. Buzzell-Plourde AssociatesSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1998-06-11· cited 40×
- In re Eduardo L.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-03-02· cited 22×
- In re Ethan H.Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 1992-06-25· cited 8×
- State v. RoySupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1993-12-21· cited 8×
- Thomas v. FingerSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1996-06-11· cited 5×
- State v. RiccioSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1988-03-29· cited 4×
- State v. WatsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1980-12-31· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.