Skip to main content

In re E.R.

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 1468

Syllabus

PERMANENT CUSTODY - Because the agency presented substantial clear and convincing evidence that placing the child in the permanent custody of the agency would serve the child's best interests, the judgment of the trial court is not against the manifest weight of the evidence because Appellant perfected his appeal within 30 days of the trial court's judgment and no other remedy exists, the issue of whether or not the trial court properly notified him of his right to appeal is moot.

Judges: Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.