In re E.R.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1468
Syllabus
PERMANENT CUSTODY - Because the agency presented substantial clear and convincing evidence that placing the child in the permanent custody of the agency would serve the child's best interests, the judgment of the trial court is not against the manifest weight of the evidence because Appellant perfected his appeal within 30 days of the trial court's judgment and no other remedy exists, the issue of whether or not the trial court properly notified him of his right to appeal is moot.
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Eastley v. VolkmanOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-22· cited 2,407×
- State v. SchiebelOhio Supreme Court· 1990-10-26· cited 1,644×
- In re C.F.Ohio Supreme Court· 2007-03-28· cited 583×
- In re SchaeferOhio Supreme Court· 2006-10-25· cited 400×
- In re K.H.Ohio Supreme Court· 2008-09-30· cited 255×
- In re Adoption of RidenourOhio Supreme Court· 1991-08-07· cited 216×
- In re R.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-08-14· cited 86×
- In re K.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-11-12· cited 72×
- In re C.B.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-03-04· cited 63×
- In re J.H.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-29· cited 47×
- In re T.J.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2016-01-13· cited 35×
- In re R.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-16· cited 29×
- In re N.L.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-10-07· cited 27×
- In re S.M.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-18· cited 23×
- In re A.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-05· cited 20×
- In re I.A.-W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-05-26· cited 11×
- In re S.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-07-12· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.