In Re Epperson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The UST argues that the Debtor must either include all of the Roommate's income in current monthly income or reduce the household size to one.”
• “the Code explicitly limits a third-party’s contribution to current monthly income to that amount the third-party pays toward the household expenses of the debtor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Tanya Johnson v. William Zimmer
  Fourth Circuit· 2012-07-11· cited 34×
• Rice, Heitman & Davis, S.C. v. Sasse (In Re Sasse)
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2010-08-13· cited 20×
• In Re Morrison
  M.D. North Carolina· 2011-01-10· cited 10×
• In Re Robinson
  E.D. Virginia· 2011-03-10· cited 10×
• In re Skiles
  N.D. Ohio· 2014-01-09· cited 8×
• Fraleigh v. Fraleigh (In re Fraleigh)
  S.D. New York· 2012-06-12· cited 4×
• In Re Coverstone
  D. Idaho· 2011-04-21· cited 2×
• In re Ross
  N.D. Georgia· 2014-03-26