In Re Entergy Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that before mandamus can issue, the applicant must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion
• holding that before mandamus can issue, the applicant must show that the trial court clearly abused its discretion
• recognizing that when administrative agencies have exclusive jurisdiction over particular matters, available administrative remedies must first be exhausted before a court may exercise its jurisdiction over the issue
• recognizing that when administrative agencies have exclusive jurisdiction over particular matters, available administrative remedies must first be exhausted before a court may exercise its jurisdiction over the issue
• construing essentially identical language of PURA and concluding that Legislature expressed clear intention that Public Utility Commission have exclusive jurisdiction over dispute between Entergy and ratepayers
• applying exception where Public Utility Commission of Texas had exclusive jurisdiction, because permitting a trial to go forward would interfere with the important legislatively mandated function and purpose of the Commission

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).