In Re Emergency Consultants, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that requiring a Rule 202 petitioner to plead a viable claim “would eviscerate the investigatory purpose of Rule 202”
• noting that requiring a Rule 202 petitioner to plead a viable claim “would eviscerate the investigatory purpose of Rule 202”
• noting that requiring a Rule 202 petitioner to plead a viable claim would place “counsel in a quandary, considering counsel’s ethical duty of candor to the court and the requirements of [rule 13]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).