In re Emanuel Q.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding, correctly, that “there was undisputed evidence that [Arlene] was in a coma after the defendant’s attack, and will remain confined to a wheelchair for the rest of her life”
• “Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the Supreme Court did not err by denying his application to submit assault in the second degree to the jury as a lesser included offense of assault in the first degree.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).