Skip to main content

In re: E.M.

Citations

  • 790 S.E.2d 863
  • 249 N.C. App. 44
  • 2016 N.C. App. LEXIS 862

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying version of statute in effect when dispositional hearing was held and decision rendered rather than version in effect at time order was filed
  • vacating award of custody where no evidence was presented supporting court's finding that custodians understood legal significance of placement
  • \[T]he inclusion of an erroneous finding of fact is not reversible error where the court's other factual findings support its determination.\ (citation omitted)
  • “[T]he inclusion of an erroneous finding of fact is not reversible error where the [trial] court’s other factual findings support its determination.”
  • “[T]he inclusion of an erroneous finding of fact is not reversible error where the [trial] court’s other factual findings support its determination.”
  • \[N]o evidence in the record supports the court's finding that either of the custodians understand the legal significance of the placement.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stephens

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.