In Re Ellis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing the standard as evidence “so clear, direct and weighty and convincing” as to enable the court to find the facts at issue “without hesitancy”
• “[T]he absence of proof of good 3 faith requires that no extension of the stay be ordered.”’
• “[T]he absence of proof of good 3 faith requires that no extension of the stay be ordered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• In Re Ferguson
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2007-10-25· cited 30×
• In Re Williams
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2006-06-21· cited 29×
• In re Muhammad
  M.D. Alabama· 2015-06-03· cited 12×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• BFP v. Resolution Trust Corporation
  Supreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 1,012×
• In Re: Pamela Knapper, F/k/a Pamela Jones, Pamela Knapper William C. Miller v. Bankers Trust Co., as Trustee for Amresco Residential Securities Corp
  Third Circuit· 2005-05-24· cited 179×
• Unnamed case
  Third Circuit· 1992-03-25· cited 171×
• In Re Aughenbaugh
  Third Circuit· 1942-02-11· cited 99×
• United States Fire Insurance Company v. Royal Insurance Company
  Third Circuit· 1985-05-13· cited 47×
• In Re Indian Palms Associates, Ltd.
  Third Circuit· 1995-07-25· cited 10×
• In Re Wilson
  E.D. Tennessee· 2005-12-05· cited 9×