In Re Elizabeth Kozak, as Attorney in Fact for Phoebe Osborne Reynolds v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that California was not required to apply Nevada's statutory cap on monetary damages in tort actions against the state when the accident involving a state employee occurred in California
• holding that California was not required to apply Nevada’s statutory cap on monetary damages in tort actions against the state when the accident involving a state employee occurred in California
• holding that domestic jurisdiction is absolute for crimes committed within borders of a country
• noting that “the Eleventh Amendment has not accorded the States absolute sovereign immunity in federal-court actions”
• holding that precluding a forum state from applying its own laws “would constitute the real intrusion on the sovereignty of the States—and the power of the people—in our Union”
• concluding that “the full faith and credit clause” does not “override the constitutional authority” of the state to legislate on matters “appropriately the concern of the state”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).