In re Electronic Transmission of the Opinions

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying upon Kent for proposition that plaintiff’s “general release of claims against these [defendants] would preclude his ability to pursue UM benefits for his uncovered losses for which these defendants are deemed responsible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).