In Re Electronic Data Systems Corp. \ERISA\ Litigation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that “[generally, courts should not apply evidentiary standards at the motion to dismiss stage because doing so conflicts with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a
• noting that “courts will typically have insufficient facts at the motion to dismiss stage from which to make the law/ fact analysis necessary to determine functional or named fiduciary status.”
• \Only a breach of fiduciary duty claim which includes a fraud claim implicates Rule 9(b).\
• “It is typically premature to determine a defendant’s fiduciary status at the motion to dismiss stage of the proceedings ... under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a
• “ERISA law imposes a duty to monitor appointees on fiduciaries with appointment power.”
• “ERISA law imposes a duty to monitor appointees on fiduciaries with appointment power.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).