Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
E.D. Texas· 2/2/2004

In Re Electronic Data Systems Corp. \ERISA\ Litigation

Citations

  • 305 F. Supp. 2d 658
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2631
  • 2004 WL 253736

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • acknowledging that “[generally, courts should not apply evidentiary standards at the motion to dismiss stage because doing so conflicts with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a
  • noting that “courts will typically have insufficient facts at the motion to dismiss stage from which to make the law/ fact analysis necessary to determine functional or named fiduciary status.”
  • \Only a breach of fiduciary duty claim which includes a fraud claim implicates Rule 9(b).\
  • “It is typically premature to determine a defendant’s fiduciary status at the motion to dismiss stage of the proceedings ... under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a
  • “ERISA law imposes a duty to monitor appointees on fiduciaries with appointment power.”
  • “ERISA law imposes a duty to monitor appointees on fiduciaries with appointment power.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Electronic Data Systems Corp. \ERISA\ Litigation

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.