Skip to main content
· 7/6/2007

In Re Electric MacHinery Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 371 B.R. 549
  • 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. B 503
  • 2007 Bankr. LEXIS 2356
  • 48 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 142
  • 2007 WL 2031445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a claim of exemption is to be determined as of the petition date
  • summarizing competing views, citing cases, and setting out primary reasons why most courts conclude that “post-petition attorneys’ fees should not be allowed as part of an unsecured claim”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael G. Williamson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.