In Re Election Law Enforcement Commission Advisory Opinion No. 01-2008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that this Court “will defer to an agency’s interpretation of both a statute and implementing regulation, within 22 the sphere of the agency’s authority, unless the interpretation is ‘plainly unreasonable’”
• explaining that “court[s] should give considerable weight to a state agency’s interpretation of a statutory scheme that the legislature has entrusted to the agency to administer”
• explaining \an appellate court should give considerable weight to a state agency's interpretation of a statutory scheme that the legislature has entrusted to the agency to administer\
• “We will defer to an agency’s interpretation of both a statute and implementing regulation, within the sphere of the agency’s authority, unless the interpretation is ‘plainly unreasonable.’ ”
• \[A] state agency brings experience and specialized knowledge to its task of administering and regulating a legislative enactment within its field of expertise.\
• “We will defer to an agency’s interpretation of both a statute and implementing regulation, within the sphere of the agency’s authority, unless the interpretation is ‘plainly unreasonable.’” (quoting Reilly v. AAA Mid-Atl. Ins. Co. of N.J., 194 N.J. 474, 485 (2008))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).