In Re El San Juan Hotel, Debtor, Appeal of Hector M. Rodriguez-Estrada

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an order authorizing a suit to move forward against an adversary defendant did not “diminish [his] property, increase his burdens, or detrimentally affect his rights”
• holding that an appellant \whose only interest is as a party defendant ... has no standing\ because the order in question \has no direct and immediate impact on appellant's pecuniary interests.\ (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• holding that an appellant “whose only interest is as a party defendant . . . has no standing” because the order in question “has no direct and immediate impact on appellant’s pecuniary interests.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding that a former trustee whose only interest or burden is as a future party defendant does not qualify as an “aggrieved person”
• stating that an appellant is a person aggrieved if the order directly “diminishes his property, increases his burdens, or impairs his rights.”
• finding that a former trustee whose only interest or burden is as a future party defendant does not qualify as an “aggrieved person”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).