In Re EI DuPont De Nemours and Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that Dupont served a privilege log describing the documents withheld
• explaining that “an affidavit, even if it addresses groups of documents rather than each document individually, has been held to be sufficient to make a prima facie showing of attorney-client and/or work product privilege”
• stating that Dupont served a privilege log describing the documents withheld
• rejecting contention affidavit not based on personal knowledge when affiant stated his determinations were based on his review of company’s human resources database and comparisons with documents
• examining whether a corporate representative’s affidavit set forth the factual basis for the attorney– client privilege’s applicability
• rejecting the contention that an affidavit was not based on personal knowledge when affiant stated his determinations were based on his review of the company’s human-resources database for the legal department

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).