In re E.H.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 4251
Syllabus
CIVIL – Best interest of the child determination is supported by clear and convincing evidence where parents demonstrate marked inability to communicate with and care for children, and parents forego all opportunities to improve their mental health and parenting abilities through counseling and psychotherapy. Clear and convincing evidence supports juvenile court's conclusion that parents did not substantially comply with case plan where no inspection of substantial house repairs performed by father was obtained, and parents refused to participate in parenting classes, psychotherapy, and group counseling.
Judges: D'Apolito
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1978-05-24· cited 4,737×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- In re MurrayOhio Supreme Court· 1990-07-03· cited 1,148×
- In re Jane Doe 1Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-01-24· cited 969×
- In Re B.C.Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-10-16· cited 193×
- In re J.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.