In Re Edwin M. Maughan, Sr., Debtor. John P. Nardei v. Edwin M. Maughan, Sr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in using its equitable powers to allow a creditor’s complaint, which was filed after the deadline set forth in Bankruptcy Rule 4004, to go forward
• equitable tolling applied to deadline, and complaint allowed three days late, where debtor failed to comply with court order to turn over documentation
• “[t]he rule is a statute of limitation—or simply a deadline—that is generally subject to the defenses of waiver, estoppel, and equitable tolling”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).