· 9/21/1981
In Re Edward S. Smith
Citations
- 656 F.2d 1101
- 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17536
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- striking an individual’s name from factual resumes on due process grounds as resumes were prepared in criminal proceeding where the individual was not indicted
- striking an individual's name from factual resumes on due process grounds as resumes were prepared in criminal proceeding where the individual was not indicted
- striking an individual's name from factual resumes on due process grounds as resumes were prepared in criminal proceeding where the individual was not indicted
- striking an individual’s name from factual resumes on due process grounds as resumes were prepared in criminal proceeding where the individual -5- was not indicted
- granting a petition to strike the record “regardless of what criminal charges may have been contemplated ... against the [petitioner for the future”
- at public plea hearing on bribery charge, prosecutor singled out unindicted individual as person receiving the bribe
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown, Garza, Beer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.