Skip to main content
· 9/21/1981

In Re Edward S. Smith

Citations

  • 656 F.2d 1101
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17536

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • striking an individual’s name from factual resumes on due process grounds as resumes were prepared in criminal proceeding where the individual was not indicted
  • striking an individual's name from factual resumes on due process grounds as resumes were prepared in criminal proceeding where the individual was not indicted
  • striking an individual's name from factual resumes on due process grounds as resumes were prepared in criminal proceeding where the individual was not indicted
  • striking an individual’s name from factual resumes on due process grounds as resumes were prepared in criminal proceeding where the individual -5- was not indicted
  • granting a petition to strike the record “regardless of what criminal charges may have been contemplated ... against the [petitioner for the future”
  • at public plea hearing on bribery charge, prosecutor singled out unindicted individual as person receiving the bribe

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Garza, Beer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.