In re Edward Hess & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “[t]he language of such reports and their conclusions would have little impact on the question of [the defendant’s] alleged conflict of interest, bias or any due process violation”
• charting development of cases in Kentucky district courts allowing discovery of, among other information, “statistical data regarding the number of claims files sent to the reviewers and the number of denials which resulted”
• “[A]n ERISA plaintiff may venture outside the record, when the claimant makes a satisfactory allegation of a violation of due process or bias by the plan administrator.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).