In Re Edmund B. Heimlich v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that a resident physician at a state hospital is an employee of the state
• noting that the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that an individual defendant is not entitled to qualified immunity
• “We do not require that an official demonstrate that he did not violate clearly established federal rights; our precedent places that burden upon plaintiffs.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “We do ‘not require that an official demonstrate that he did not violate clearly established federal rights; our precedent places that burden upon plaintiffs.’” (quoting Salas, 980 F.2d at 306)
• “We do ‘not require that an official demonstrate that he did not violate clearly established federal rights; our precedent places that burden upon plaintiffs.’” (quoting Salas, 980 F.2d at 306)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).