In Re Edmonds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Congress intended to permit the cure and maintenance of long-term unsecured debts, notwithstanding § 1322(b)(10)
• “[P]ost-petition interest cannot be paid unless the plan provides that all of the unsecured creditors will be fully paid. Sec[tion]. 1322(b)(10) is very clear in its wording.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Monahan (In re Monahan)
  First Circuit· 2013-09-19· cited 17×
• In re Stull
  D. Kansas· 2013-03-27· cited 12×
• In re Brown
  S.D. Georgia· 2013-09-06· cited 10×
• In re Shelton
  N.D. Illinois· 2018-09-14· cited 8×
• In re Precise
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2013-06-24· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• In Re: Wayne K. Crawford, Debtor-Appellant
  Seventh Circuit· 2003-04-01· cited 42×
• In Re Chandler
  D. New Hampshire· 1997-07-07· cited 27×
• In Re Benner
  D. Minnesota· 1993-07-28· cited 25×
• In Re Thibodeau
  D. Massachusetts· 2000-05-19· cited 21×
• In Re Cox
  N.D. Florida· 1995-09-15· cited 19×
• In Re Coonce
  S.D. Illinois· 1997-09-25· cited 17×
• In Re Harding
  S.D. Florida· 2010-02-08· cited 14×
• George Squillacote v. United States
  Seventh Circuit· 1984-07-13· cited 10×
• In Re Hanson
  W.D. Wisconsin· 2004-04-21· cited 8×
• In Re Truss
  E.D. Wisconsin· 2009-04-24· cited 8×
• In Re Potgieter
  M.D. Florida· 2010-04-14· cited 7×