Skip to main content
· 5/28/1991

In Re Edmond

Citations

  • 934 F.2d 1304
  • 20 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 542
  • 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 11240

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Although the court initially struck the defendant’s affidavit, the court conditionally allowed the affidavit upon completion of a deposition of the defendant; when defendant still failed to comply with the order compelling deposition, the affidavit was stricken.
  • “Although the Division, under Maryland law, eventually may have to provide a procedure to notify and process individual consumers’ desire for reimbursement, the failure to do so does not alter the Division's ability to ensure that the Act's provisions for restitution will not be eviscerated.”
  • affirming district court’s decision to disregard declaration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.