Skip to main content
· 11/17/1928

In re Echols

Citations

  • 30 F.2d 190
  • 1928 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1678

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Hearings officers may not, “after the fact, manufacture a reason that justifies a stop in the absence of any direct evidence about whether the officer believed that an infraction occurred before stopping the driver.”
  • Hearing officers may not, “after the fact, manufacture a reason that justifies a stop in the absence of any direct evidence about whether the officer believed that an infraction occurred before stopping the driver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Atwell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.