In Re E.C.
Syllabus
In this termination of parental rights action, Father's parental rights were terminated based on the following grounds: (1) failure to manifest an ability and willingness to assume legal and physical custody of the child (2) that placing the child in Father's legal and physical custody would pose a risk of substantial harm to the child's physical and psychological welfare (3) failure to establish or exercise paternity and (4) abandonment by wanton disregard for the welfare of the child. We affirm the grounds of failure to manifest an ability and willingness to assume legal and physical custody of the child and failure to establish or exercise paternity. However, we reverse with respect to the remaining grounds. We also affirm the trial court's determination that termination of Father's parental rights is in the best interest of the child. Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded
Judges: Judge J. Steven Stafford
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court· 2000-06-05· cited 6,943×
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1972-04-03· cited 5,889×
- In Re ValentineTennessee Supreme Court· 2002-07-19· cited 1,212×
- In Re Audrey S.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-11-07· cited 1,098×
- White v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2004-12-30· cited 737×
- In Re Carrington H.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2016-01-29· cited 732×
- In re M.J.B.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2004-04-08· cited 730×
- In Re Bernard T.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 702×
- Hawk v. HawkTennessee Supreme Court· 1993-06-01· cited 684×
- In Re Angela E.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2010-02-16· cited 623×
- In Re: Kaliyah S.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2015-01-22· cited 554×
- In re M.A.R.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2005-08-11· cited 541×
- Estate of Walton v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court· 1997-09-02· cited 428×
- In re D.L.B.Tennessee Supreme Court· 2003-10-20· cited 414×
- Ray v. RayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2001-10-05· cited 399×
- McCaleb v. Saturn Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court· 1995-11-02· cited 361×
- Whitaker v. WhitakerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 1997-04-22· cited 354×
- In Re JACOBE M.J.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2013-12-05· cited 229×
- In re Navada N.Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2016-05-23· cited 218×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.