In re Eberhart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Simply put, such a distribution, prompted by the trustee’s self-interest, would be a breach of his fiduciary duty and would give rise to a right to recovery on behalf of the trust from the trustee individually”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. Coffey
  E.D. New York· 2005-03-29· cited 17×
• In re the Estate of Wallens
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-06-09· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Gruen v. Gruen
  New York Court of Appeals· 1986-07-08· cited 115×
• Heath v. State
  New York Court of Appeals· 1951-10-19· cited 11×
• Heath v. State
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1951-03-07· cited 9×
• In re Mainzer
  New York Surrogate's Court· 1991-06-14· cited 4×