In re E.B.
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 2089
Syllabus
Results of genetic tests are not \newly-discovered\ evidence for purposes of motion to set aside judgment of paternity Civ.R. 60(B)(2) does not apply. Civ.R. 60(B)(4) or (5) may be available in some cases, but not to mother who could have reasonably prevented judgment. Mother's knowledge may not be imputed to child, on whose behalf motion was filed. Court must consider recommendation of guardian ad litem and determine if it is in child's best interest to seek to set aside acknowledgment of paternity.
Judges: Mayle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court· 1976-07-21· cited 2,230×
- Strack v. PeltonOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-31· cited 507×
- Knapp v. KnappOhio Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 154×
- Gilbraith v. HixsonOhio Supreme Court· 1987-08-19· cited 82×
- Cuyahoga Support Enforcement Agency v. GuthrieOhio Supreme Court· 1999-02-17· cited 71×
- Hulett v. HulettOhio Supreme Court· 1989-09-20· cited 24×
- State ex rel. Loyd v. LoveladyOhio Supreme Court· 2006-02-01· cited 20×
- Leguillon v. LeguillonOhio Court of Appeals· 1998-01-12· cited 12×
- Kerger & Hartman, L.L.C. v. AjamiOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-08-25· cited 10×
- West v. ReichmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-27· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.