Skip to main content
· 4/28/2006

In Re Eastepp

Citations

  • 281 Kan. 698
  • 132 P.3d 918
  • 2006 Kan. LEXIS 231

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • attorney’s numerous untrue filings had no substantial purpose other than to embarrass, delay, or burden

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.