Skip to main content
N.D. Indiana· 1/10/1992

In Re Earl

Citations

  • 140 B.R. 728
  • 1992 Bankr. LEXIS 2430
  • 1992 WL 110247

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • arguing for broad power under § 105(a) due to similarity to 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a)
  • “[T]he relevant factors to be considered vary from case to case.” (citing In re Jones, 119 B.R. 996, 1002–03 (Bankr. N.D. Ind. 1990))
  • statement and plan filed nine days late resulted in dismissal without prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kent Lindquist

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named In Re Earl

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.