Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania· 3/24/2016
In re Eakin
Citations
- 150 A.3d 1042
- 2016 Pa. Jud. Disc. LEXIS 24
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the Judicial Conduct Board has not produced any evidence that Justice Eakin has ever demonstrated any overt bias in his written judicial opinions.
- “In addition to factual stipulations, the parties have also stipulated to the authenticity and admissibility of all exhibits set forth in their respective pre-trial memoranda . . ..”
- “[W]here the parties enter into stipulations of fact which are accepted by the Court, the facts so stipulated will be considered to have been proven as if the party bearing the burden of proof has produced clear and convincing evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barton, Colville, Hardaway, Mullen, Panella, Shrager
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-12-14· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. Robinson, A., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-12-14· cited 1×
- In re TiddJudicial Discipline of Pennsylvania· 2017-12-15· cited 1×
- Commonwealth v. Koehler, J.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-04-24
- Commonwealth v. Smith, B., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-07-21
- Commonwealth v. Fears, L., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-05-18
- In the Matter of Angel Catina UnderwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2022-05-25
- Commonwealth v. Johnson, H., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2023-02-22
Cites
27 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Matter of SylvesterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1989-03-03· cited 110×
- Matter of LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-10-14· cited 82×
- In Re LokutaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-01-14· cited 82×
- In Re CicchettiJudicial Discipline of Pennsylvania· 1997-03-31· cited 74×
- In re BrunoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-08-28· cited 70×
- In Re SmithJudicial Discipline of Pennsylvania· 1996-12-10· cited 59×
- In re GreenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1971-03-24· cited 58×
- In Re MelograneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-18· cited 55×
- In Re CicchettiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2000-01-13· cited 45×
- In Re BerkhimerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2007-08-20· cited 30×
- In Re StrockJudicial Discipline of Pennsylvania· 2003-01-23· cited 27×
- In Re BerryJudicial Discipline of Pennsylvania· 2009-06-25· cited 25×
- In re MerloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-09-28· cited 23×
- In re CarneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-10-30· cited 22×
- In Re LokutaJudicial Discipline of Pennsylvania· 2008-12-09· cited 19×
- In Re EagenJudicial Discipline of Pennsylvania· 2002-12-19· cited 17×
- In Re HarringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-06-22· cited 14×
- In Re ZelloeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-12-19· cited 9×
- Inquiry Concerning a Judge, No. 14-255 Re John C. MURPHYSupreme Court of Florida· 2015-12-17· cited 9×
- In Re Daghir, 1 Jd 95 (pa.ct.jud.disc. 4-10-1995)Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania· 1995-04-10· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.