In re E.A.E.

Citations

• 2019 Ohio 2749

Syllabus

The juvenile court did not err in overruling appellant's motion to suppress his statements made to police during an initial encounter before his detention and during a subsequent audio/video recorded interview at the police station after he was advised of his Miranda rights. The record supports the trial court's overruling of the motion the appellant was properly advised of his constitutional rights before the custodial interview, and he knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently waived them and voluntarily made statements. Appellant's adjudication of responsibility for one count of sexual battery under R.C. 2907.03(A)(2) was not against the manifest weight of the evidence the trier of fact did not clearly lose its way and create a manifest miscarriage of justice. Judgment affirmed.