In re E.A.
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 2964
Syllabus
Arguments as to abandonment and placement within reasonable time are moot where it is undisputed that the child was in the custody of the agency for at least 12 months of a consecutive 22-month period. The juvenile court need only make one of the five enumerated findings contained in R.C. 2151.414(B)(1). As to the best interest factors, the juvenile court did not err by granting permanent custody in favor of the children services agency where the parents had not seen the child in more than two years and failed in their case plan requirements.
Judges: Ringland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court· 1982-02-22· cited 9,761×
- In re C.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-14· cited 81×
- In re D.K.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-30· cited 80×
- In re G.F.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-16· cited 72×
- In re M.B.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-11-10· cited 64×
- In re A.W.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-07-21· cited 43×
- In re B.C.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2018-07-09· cited 19×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.